Browse Items (2 total)

Tags: 1980, Area Coordinators, Capabilities in each county, Coding Intake and Detention, correspondence, Illinois Juvenile Court Watching Project, League of Women Voters, Local Monitoring Projects, Monitors Project Personnel, projects, Report of Project Findings and Recommendations, State Project

Tags: 1981, Are the Juvenile and Family Involved, Courtroom facilities, Does the Case go on too Long, Does the Court User really understand, Esteem and Prestige of the Juvenile court, Getting Help for the Juvenile and Family, Human Dilemma, Illinois Juvenile Court Watching Project, Illinois Juvenile court Watching Project: How it Got Started, Illinois Juvenile court: what the Monitors Said, Judge in the Courtroom, Juveniles in Secure Custody when Brought to the Hearing, League of Women Votes, Map of Monitored Counties, Members and Staff of Project Steering Committee, Out of the Shadows, projects, Quality of Representation for Juveniles and Families, recommendations, Repayment of costs by Families, Report Forms, Report forms and Computer, Scheduling of Cases, Thumbnail Sketch of Juvenile Court in Illinois, Total Time Spent on Proceedings, Were Respondents Represented by Public or Private Counsel, What about the Prosecution, What Brought Them to Court, What Kinds of Hearing Were Observed, What the Data Says and Does Not Say, What the Monitors Saw, What were the Outcomes of the Hearings, When court Reporters weren't Present, Where else to go, Who Came to Court, Who was with the Juvenile of the Adjudicatory Hearing, Why Did Citizens Watch Juvenile court